8 Comments

So happy to see others talking about dialetheism on Substack lol

Great list! 👍

Expand full comment

Language is a social construct. It doesn't by itself adhere to the logic of reality, but our closest estimation of it. We can just as well say "This sentence is a paradox" or "This sentence is x" where x means neither true nor false. Bending a language doesn't imply bending the logic itself.

Further, logic itself is culturally informed, and thus a near estimation of reality at best. So if it's a little shabby here and there, it shouldn't raise any alarms.

There. Solved. What was needed was just a little bit of continental philosophy.

Expand full comment
author

This is just a series of assertions, not a solution.

Expand full comment

A funny thing about the liar paradox is that it’s the only true sentence.

Expand full comment

Okay, for some reason I always thought his name was "J. C. Beall". But I see you're writing his name "Jc Beall", and I just noticed the same spelling on Brian Leiter's blog. Are the letters "J" and "C" not initials? And if not, how is his name pronounced?

Expand full comment
author

They are initials, but he just goes by 'Jc' for a long time. At this point it has stuck.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the video and the reading list!

Just to add one more book to your "Advanced Logic" section: Logic for Philosophers, by Theodore Sider.

I wish you had mentioned Yablo's paradox in your video. It's my favorite variation of the Liar Paradox, because it shows that the problem with the Liar is not circularity.

Expand full comment